Hot Topics | |
---|---|
vitellus wrote:About Urayasu - I was just talking today to someone who was in Urayasu on business when the earthquake struck. He told me that a crack opened in the street and water came out, and a 7/11 partially sunk into the ground. I found it hard to believe since it is not that far from Tokyo but I didn't know that it was also on reclaimed land and prone to liquefaction....
Samurai_Jerk wrote:U.S. shows growing alarm over Japan nuclear crisis
The State Department said the United States has chartered aircraft to help Americans leave Japan and had authorized the voluntary departure of family members of diplomatic staff in Tokyo, Nagoya and Yokohama -- about 600 people
FG Lurker wrote:Yeah, I have a friend with a house at an odd angle in Shin Urayasu... Lots of liquefaction changes in the level of the ground. It's quite a mess.
My house in Osaka isn't on reclaimed land but the land is definitely softer than I would like. I hope to move within the next couple of years and wherever I end up building it will be on top of bedrock...
cstaylor wrote:The biggest problem is that they are stored together. With enough space or shielding between them, they wouldn't be so active.
The cooling pool really should be in another location though.
AssKissinger wrote:I'm actually quite shocked by that.
FG Lurker wrote:Nah, it just makes the rest of the Americans more French for panicking and running away.
FG Lurker wrote:The parts on reclaimed land however are fucked. Houses partially sunk and at odd angles, roads all busted up, liquefaction everywhere (huge mud flows), power poles have sunk into the ground (sometimes several meters straight down), no water, no gas... It's nothing compared to what happened up north but it's scary to think how bad it will be when a strong quake strikes closer to Tokyo.
Yokohammer wrote:This just on the news:
The water canon attempt has failed. The water failed to reach the target and the intrepid police team had to retreat (aka "run away") due to the high radiation levels.
They might as well just throw water balloons at the thing from a couple of kilometers away.
EDIT: I keep hearing "due to safety concerns we can't allow our people to get too close to the reactor." In my mind that translates as "due to safety concerns we're going to allow the reactors to blow and irradiate the entire fucking country for generations to come". Nice safety country thinking there.
Yokohammer wrote:EDIT: I keep hearing "due to safety concerns we can't allow our people to get too close to the reactor." In my mind that translates as "due to safety concerns we're going to allow the reactors to blow and irradiate the entire fucking country for generations to come". Nice safety country thinking there.
Coligny wrote:For frack sake, give me 4 hours with one of these truck and I can make it remote controlled, even by fiber optic wire if it need to be interference proof.
Did nuclear radiation also give people "th3 stoopid" ?
ichigo partygirl wrote:
Coligny wrote:For frack sake, give me 4 hours with one of these truck and I can make it remote controlled, even by fiber optic wire if it need to be interference proof.
Did nuclear radiation also give people "th3 stoopid" ?
Coligny wrote:Neener neener you'z Frenchier than me...
Repeat aftur me:
frrrrRRRRROOOOOmage...
MahDEUHmouaZeLLLE...
Now harder but most necessary:
Voullez coucher avec moua ce soir ?
Taka-Okami wrote:Everyone knows Asians in general cannt think out of the box. That's why they arent finding a solution as it isnt in the manual.
Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests