canman wrote: It seems that TEPCO and everybody else involved in this disaster really have no idea how to stop a major disaster from happening.
Because until now you considered their response as appropriate ?
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
canman wrote: It seems that TEPCO and everybody else involved in this disaster really have no idea how to stop a major disaster from happening.
to be honest... that fit a bit more japanese driving style...chokonen888 wrote:Fixed that for yah! (and Australia doesn't count)
]
Dude... : HOLDEN....in the interests of international harmony let's all drive down the middle
Coligny wrote:Dude... : HOLDEN....
to be honest... that fit a bit more japanese driving style...
canman wrote:What can the gov't do if people refuse to evacuate their homes in the Fukushima area. I saw on the news one older woman who said her husband couldn't move so they were going to stay at her home. Can the force them to leave? Do they have to continue to bring them food etc. It is a very tricky area.
Though I hope that the Japanese government does not take the step of permanently evacuating large, lightly contaminated areas, there is little doubt that some formerly prosperous farms and fisheries will be out of business for a very long time.
chokonen888 wrote:Speaking of driving, this whole disaster has shown how "prepared" Japan is. Public transportation shuts down and traffic congestion means everyone basically idles, parked in the street, until their tank is empty. Makes me consider getting a bike or scooter...
omae mona wrote:In light of things at Fukushima going a bit worse than predicted worst-case, and some new specific news in the last few days, I am starting to see some independent experts changing their tune a bit.
omae mona wrote:Up until this point, one of his main points was that plants are so fundamentally safe that, even given what happened on March 11, there would be no health risks to the workers and certainly no damage to the environment outside of the plant.
omae mona wrote:Workers are being exposed to radiation levels that could be raising their long-term cancer risk, though nothing like Chernobyl.
Well, duh, if you look at the published radiation counts for Ibaraki-ken, you can infer from sqr(distance) that it must be really bad in Fukushima-ken.omae mona wrote:And worse, the area close to the plant is definitely getting contaminated, probably resulting in long-term effects.
omae mona wrote:What changed?
omae mona wrote:Basically he's saying that while he still believes the technology behind nuclear power plants is fundamentally incredibly safe, it needs to be backed up by a continuous process of careful engineering, training, and maintenance.
omae mona wrote:That's what went wrong at Fukushima. The people screwed it up.
cstaylor wrote:That might have been his belief, but it wasn't based on facts. Those BWRs require active cooling, and TEPCO's bean counters couldn't be bothered to game out a tsunami scenario.
Or they could be receiving multiple sieverts of radiation in a short amount of time because TEPCO couldn't be bothered to enforce safety guidelines for (expendable) subcontractors.
Well, duh, if you look at the published radiation counts for Ibaraki-ken, you can infer from sqr(distance) that it must be really bad in Fukushima-ken.
Nothing changed over here. Maybe he concluded that TEPCO is criminally incompetent?
Anything requiring human intervention should fail-safe. GE's bargain-bin reactor design fails completely.
LOL. That's gotta be the engineering cop-out of the year.
Nuclear power has (at least) three problems:
- Overly complicated power plant designs
- Waste material too toxic for too long
- Too focused on solving "interesting" problems rather than optimizing the conversion of steam into kinetic energy... which is how all power-plants work.
Japan's nuclear regulator has amassed power while growing closer to the industry it regulates, according to former regulators and industry critics who blame the trend for lapses that may have contributed to the Fukushima Daiichi accident.
Bucking the global standard, Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry has two distinct and often competing roles: regulating the nuclear power industry, and promoting Japanese nuclear technology at home and abroad.
The setup recalls U.S. regulation of offshore drilling before last year's oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, in which the same agency regulated the industry and promoted offshore oil-and- gas development. One of the Obama administration's first post-spill actions was to break up the agency.
In the U.S., the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees nuclear plants, is independent from the Department of Energy, which researches and promotes nuclear power.
Critics say that if regulators in Japan had been more independent they might have imposed stricter regulations on plant safety that could have prevented the crisis or eased its severity.
The ministry ordered companies in 2006 to review the earthquake readiness of their nuclear plants, but it didn't set a deadline. Tokyo Electric Power Co., or Tepco, the operator of the Fukushima Daiichi plant, filed its interim review in 2009. Its only mention of tsunami was to say that it was continuing to study the subject.
"The regulators are so friendly with power companies that they don't hold them responsible for so many things," said Tetsuya Iida, a former nuclear-industry engineer who heads a think tank...
chokonen888 wrote: ... not just fire a few figure heads and make motions as if something is being done with no real changes
Japan Times wrote:Kan blamed for slowing response
The government's initial responses to contain the crisis at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power station after the March 11 quake were delayed by Prime Minister Naoto Kan's effort to inspect the plant by helicopter the next morning, government sources revealed Sunday
cstaylor wrote:Or the retards at TEPCO could have kept ample backup generators several kilometers inland, away from any possible tsunami danger.
FG Lurker wrote:Yeah, cause it's not like the power lines from those generators would've gotten wiped out by the tsunami.......like all the other power lines into the plants were.....
I have no doubt there is a long list of things that TEPCO has fucked up -- or in the very least things they could've done better. I also think we need to keep in mind that this was an M9.0 quake and the plants were apparently hit with a 14m high tsunami. The death toll from the quake/tsunami combo is almost certainly going to surpass 20,000 people, quite possibly get close to 30,000 people. No one expected a quake or tsunami of this size to hit this region. It's not surprising that things got fucked up.
Jack wrote:No doubt there could be no defense against the natural disasters that hit. But fuck, why are they not mixing the cement already? Burry those things already. The plant is a write-off anyway. It will never be used again.
cstaylor wrote:Looks like they're trying to pin it on Kan now...
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110328a3.html
Or the retards at TEPCO could have kept ample backup generators several kilometers inland, away from any possible tsunami danger.
canman wrote:By the way what the hell are we calling this earthquake now? I have heard about 4 different names and I would like to know what it is really called.
"This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it."
Nigel Tufnel: Well it really puts a perspective on things, now, doesn't it?
David St. Hubbins: Not too much. Not too much fucking perspective.
omae mona wrote:No, seriously, thanks for the link, Ikemen. This kind of information and viewpoint has been available in abundance since the start of the incident. But once adrenalin kicks in and the fear of radiation has taken hold of somebody, these scientific explanations have no effect.
Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest