
http://flyjin.com/
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
The disasters that devastated Japan this month quickly revealed a resilient and cohesive society coming together. People most affected waited patiently in line for small amounts of food, shopkeepers sold their last rice balls at discount prices, and ski resorts handed out clothes to those in needs.
Tokyo's expatriate community has shown less unity; many are leaving the city or country for safer ground. But while the traumas inflicted on the nation may bring the country closer, they are pulling at the expat community.
Expats are a quirky lot. I know, I am one, having lived in Japan for two years and, before that, over two years in Lithuania. Here in Japan, they are bankers, computer programmers and English teachers. They are a mix of bravado, uncertainty, and opportunism, trying to find something abroad they could not find at home -- money, adventure, love, or acceptance. Many are just short-timers, here for the job or an experience, destined to return home or to another foreign posting. Some truly begin to adopt Japan, learning the language and finding ways to stay for the long-term.
All have stories. The teacher who became a translator; the computer geek who became an IT technician; or the banker who married local and now owns a bar. Inevitably, a split develops between the old timers -- the ones who learned the language, married local, or are dead-set against leaving -- and the short-timers, who talk over sake about the Japanese idiosyncrasies they are just discovering. These are the same discussions the older expats once had, though they are unlikely now to admit it. A modest superiority builds among the old-timers, like the way Floridians thumb their noses at pasty northern coming south for winter sun.
For some in this crowd, leaving Tokyo after the quake was treasonous. They fume on websites, calling foreigners who left "flyjins" -- a pun from the Japanese word, gaijins, for foreigner. They claim those who fled inaccurately judged the limited impact of the earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear mishap. And they have a point.
Many fled immediately after the earthquake. Others waited, but later took off after the unclear government reports about the nuclear power plant and the vague reassurances from a utility known to falsify records. The decision -- between living in an ongoing, seismically active, potentially radiated environment versus fleeing to Singapore -- became easy. But their departure has in some cases, much to the chagrin of locals and some old-timers, disrupted businesses that relied on their work.
The foreign media has become a main scapegoat for the exodus. No doubt the overly dramatic, 24-hour new cycle contributed to the global hysteria. (One television news producer asked me to be "dramatic" for my on-camera interview.) In some cases, they overplayed fears with headlines like "Get Out of Tokyo, Now" and on occasion made gross missteps, as with a Fox News report on nuclear dangers at a concert venue in Tokyo, which the network mistook for a power plant. That is inexcusable, but some of media's inability to report was because they too had difficulty getting straight facts and sound judgments from an initially reclusive government and utility. The media was not alone in trying to make responsible decisions in the dark. Even as recently as last week, the International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to get info it sought to make its own analysis.
Expats have continued to trickle out of Japan for a myriad of reasons. Warnings of an impending large tremors; nuclear uncertainty; a lack of confidence in the government or the utility; impending food and electricity shortages; nagging relatives; and a general choice to live somewhere without inconveniences. Those who stayed ultimately did so for one reason -- they felt safe.
One expat who stuck it out commented on a website that he had proudly endured three months without water after the devastating 1995 Kobe earthquake. Like many who stayed, he had harsh words for those who fled, commenting that instead of remaining in Japan to help those in need, they vanished without word. To be fair, many expats' connections to their home country, families, and jobs might be a bigger influence on their lives than neighbors they likely have not met.
Besides, many expats, even if they stay, will be of little use in the response. An investment banker is as useless in devising strategies to bring water to Miyagi as is a relief worker trading credit default swaps. The choice of an expat to stay may use resources better left to those in need.
Camaraderie with the locals may be a feel-good reason to stay, but even aid workers have been known to leave in uncertain safety situations, as I've learned in my work running a non-profit organization that works in regions affected by disaster . I like to think I'm not prone to knee-jerk reactions regarding security, but, after considering my personal situation and access to information, I decided to leave three days after the quake for what was to be a week away. Many times, leaving is not so much about fleeing imminent danger as it is about making a decision while still leaving open a range of options.
To be sure, old-timer expats are not alone in criticizing those who have decided to leave. There are Japanese upset that many, including fellow compatriots, fled -- in a sense, deserting them to ride out uncertainties alone.
It's almost paradoxical that so many expats, who years ago left their home countries for the security and comfort of the Japanese lifestyle, are now criticizing those who are leaving Japan for the sake of security and comfort. But they have a point -- perhaps most significantly, those who fled did not respond in typical Japanese, community-first fashion. But ironically, as expats increasingly focus on judging, criticizing, or defending one another, they are less focused on the community that now most needs their support -- the Japanese.
Mike in Tokyo Rogers wrote:I love this site. How did I ever miss it before?
[SIZE="3"]Japan's Attack of the Giant Jellyfish From Space![/SIZE]
FRIDAY, MARCH 11, 2011
POSTED BY MIKEINTOKYOROGERS AT 12:43 PM
Mulboyne wrote:Ken Worsley, who runs the Japan Economy News blog, briefly flipped out and posted "A Message to the Flyjin". he has now removed it from his blog but Captain Japan pointed me towards it in Google cache:
Mulboyne wrote:Ken Worsley, who runs the Japan Economy News blog, briefly flipped out and posted "A Message to the Flyjin". he has now removed it from his blog but Captain Japan pointed me towards it in Google cache:
This awful situation has created a most unhelpful, pointless rift between some of those who have stayed and the "flygins" who hit the escape button in the days after March 11. To those who think I have done the wrong thing by staying: I trust the official advice regarding risks in Tokyo. No one is being a hero here, we simply want to get on with the fantastic lives we have built in Tokyo over the past six years.
And to those who have left: I respect your decision as the right thing for your personal circumstances.
Don't expect me to be forgiving of foreigners who left Japan out of fear, because their family told them to, or because "they could.
...These actions have permanently damaged the brand called "foreigner.
Half of embassies return from jump-to-conclusion flight from never-in-danger Tokyo. The other 1/2 can stay away!
Wonder why J govt didn't ditch Tokyo just as so many Foreign Embassies did. Oh, I get it. They were stupid to stay. Yeah, right.
American Players Flee Country, Abandoning Japanese Pro Baseball Teams. I say never let the whimpy cowards back!
Foreigners who consciously decided to stay in Japan after 3/11 & not escape are NOT heroes. But they were sensible & should be noticed.
Thanks to the foreigners who 'took off' after 3/11, the average Japanese now trusts foreigners less. Thks for role modeling cowardliness.
I know I'm slamming foreigners who jumped ship. For some (a minuscule number) it WAS the right thing to do. I'm talking about the OTHERS.
These OTHERS damn well know who they are. You are no friend of Japan. Stay home with Mommy & Daddy. UR not strong enough for life in Japan.
See my rants led to 3 folks de-following me. Hey, I have my opinions and you have yours.
Don't know if I'm saying what a lot of others are thinking but are just too polite 2 say. I really don't know. I could be a 1 man circus.
Mulboyne wrote:Here's a series of tweets (still being added to as I write) by "Timothy J. Phelan, editor of thejapanobserver.com & Prof. of Japanese Studies @ Miyagi University"
damn name wrote:There seems to be a lot of condemnation within the nuclear industry of US NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko's decision to advise a 50 mile evacuation area for Americans in Japan. The only place a 50 mile zone is even mentioned in US evacuation planning is for radiation monitoring out to 50 miles. There is no 50 mile evacuation zone in any evacuation planning in the US, but it's now being quoted and used as a precedent.
Apparently he overrode the entire staff.
omae mona wrote:I still don't grasp the line of reasoning that anybody's decision to leave has anything to do with loyalty to Japan. I know just as many Japanese people who have fled the Tokyo area (including leaving the country) as foreigners. The people who left are in a semi-psychotic, delusional state, and have whipped themselves into believing there is a health risk, and a major one to boot.
Once you've convinced yourself it's dangerous to be here, why would you stay, regardless of whether you're foreigner or Japanese? It's not as if anybody is needed for the war effort. If these foreigners faced the same situation in their home countries, they would have fled, the same as they are doing here.
I don't understand what this professor is expecting. People are in this delusional state, basically thinking Godzilla is coming to kill them. Suddenly their conscience is supposed to kick in and make them think "gosh, this could have a poor impact on the image of foreigners. Maybe I should let Godzilla bite my head off"?
FG Lurker wrote:I think there are two issues here that annoy people:
1) Residents who ran from Tokyo (or even worse, Osaka) due to fears of radiation have shown themselves to be unreliable and to have poor judgement.
2) It is unfortunate human nature to group people together and this is no different (maybe even worse) in Japan. Unfortunately the large number of gaijin who ran does reflect badly on all foreigners as a group. We all end up looking less reliable and more likely to run off if the shit hits the fan.(Obviously not all Japanese will group all gaijin together like this but realistically there will be a lot who will.)
omae mona wrote:...The people who left are in a semi-psychotic, delusional state, and have whipped themselves into believing there is a health risk, and a major one to boot...
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
Mulboyne wrote:I don't think that's a good description either. Radiation may be all over the news right now but there are quite a few foreigners who bugged out primarily because of the earthquakes. I saw the same thing happen after Kobe.
Unlike radiation threats, there really is nothing you can realistically say to someone who fears an imminent Tokyo earthquake. You can't say they are delusional and you can't say their fears are unfounded. You can suggest that a devastating quake might be unlikely but there doesn't seem to be any firmer science for that claim than there is for the idea that the risk has risen.
Mulboyne wrote:I don't think that's a good description either. Radiation may be all over the news right now but there are quite a few foreigners who bugged out primarily because of the earthquakes. I saw the same thing happen after Kobe.
Iraira wrote: The streets in front of Shinjuku Tipness are pretty damn dark and quiet now. It doesn't feel like Tokyo. The streets and stations have some 1950's & 60's noir feeling, albeit only from the visual perspective of noir, that is a major departure from the neon sonic blast that is Tokyo.
omae mona wrote:...I literally have encountered only one person since March 11 (my dentist) who seemed more concerned about earthquakes than radiation.
Mulboyne wrote:I'm pleased to know, since I plan on using their amazing expat Tokyo apartments and having you all over for a few raging parties which still have some months to run on their contracts.
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
Mulboyne wrote:For me, the question isn't about who is using radiation as the reason to leave and more about who would have left anyway even if radiation had never been an issue. If radiation is your concern, then you you'll soon find grounds, if you haven't already, to return. If quakes underpin your worries, then you are probably out for good.
If anything, this experience should make non-Japanese residents re-examine our loyalties: Where is our home? How much do we feel a part of Japanese society, and should we too take up the responsibilities of contributing to it and living within its norms?
omae mona wrote:To me, this reads as if the author's point is that the radiation fears are rational, but "loyalty" should keep us in Japan anyway. I have no idea what "responsibilities of contributing to [society]" he is referring to, or which "norms" we are supposed to live in (the norm of exposing yourself to risk of cancer?).
canman wrote:I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday and we were thinking that some of the people leaving, had wanted to leave before, but were looking for an excuse. The earthquake, tsunami, radiation post apocalyptic prognostications were just the kick in the pants they needed.
A few people that I know here, were completely freaked out by the earthquakes, and now that they have settled down, and things are returning to normal here in Hachinohe, they too have settled down.
On a side note, I was very depressed to see that as of April 1st most of the stores that were practicing "safe electricity" minimal lighting and heating, have things back too 100% now.
Still no yogurt, natto, and very limited amounts of tofu and eggs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests