Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Russell wrote:Breaking: Level 1 Warning Upgraded to Level 3: Serious Incident Now:
Don't eat the the fucking "saury" (NHK News)!
The Japanese government on Tuesday pledged 47 billion yen to contain leaks and decontaminate radioactive water from the tsunami-crippled Fukushima nuclear plant, as the government stepped up its intervention in the worst atomic disaster in a quarter century.
The announcement comes just days before the International Olympics Committee decides whether Tokyo - 230 km from the wrecked plant - will host the 2020 Olympics and the government is keen to show the crisis is under control. Madrid and Istanbul are the rival candidates.
“The world is watching to see if we can carry out the decommissioning of the Fukushima nuclear power plant, including addressing the contaminated water issues,” Prime Minister Shinzo Abe told cabinet ministers, who met to approve the plan.
The government intervention represents only a tiny slice of the response to the Fukushima crisis triggered by the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami, which caused reactor meltdowns at the plant. The clean-up, including decommissioning the ruined reactors, will take decades and rely on unproven technology.
The measures do not address the full problem of water management at the plant, leave the fate of Fukushima operator Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) unclear, and do not address the bigger problem of decommissioning. The sensitive job of removing spent fuel rods is to start in the coming months.
Nor do they clarify who will eventually foot the bill.
“This is a matter of public safety, so the country has to take the lead on this issue and respond as quickly as possible. Figuring out who to bill for the costs can come later,” Economics Minister Akira Amari told a news conference.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told a separate news conference that the government would spend a total of 47 billion yen, including 21 billion yen in emergency reserve funds from this year’s budget.
Scientists will freeze the soil around the stricken reactors to form an impenetrable wall they hope will direct groundwater away from the plant. This will entail burying pipes vertically and passing refrigerant through them. Officials estimate the whole project will take two years and cost around 32 billion yen.
The remaining 15 billion yen will be used to improve a water treatment system meant to drastically reduce radiation levels in the contaminated water.
[...]
Critics said the government was mainly trying to cool down international media coverage ahead of the Olympics decision.
“At a moment when international public opinion is worrying about the long-term consequences of repeated leaks at the site, Tokyo seems to obeying the short-term logic of waiting until the Olympics decision is over,” Mycle Schneider, an independent nuclear energy analyst based in Paris who frequently visits Japan, said by email. A more sustainable option, he added, would be to seek global support to confront Fukushima’s unprecedented challenges.
Motegi denied the Olympic bid was the main motivating factor. “The government felt that we want to be fully involved and put together fundamental measures regardless of the decision on where they will hold the Games,” he said.
More
chokonen888 wrote:I'm starting to hope that they get the Olympic bid...and this bullshit they're selling as the best they can do blows up in their faces with the rest of the world watching.
Yokohammer wrote:chokonen888 wrote:I'm starting to hope that they get the Olympic bid...and this bullshit they're selling as the best they can do blows up in their faces with the rest of the world watching.
Be careful what you wish for.
wagyl wrote:Choko's current life plan has him outside of Tokyo by 2020....
Samurai_Jerk wrote:wagyl wrote:Choko's current life plan has him outside of Tokyo by 2020....
True but we all know that shit ain't gonna last.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Yokohammer wrote:chokonen888 wrote:I'm starting to hope that they get the Olympic bid...and this bullshit they're selling as the best they can do blows up in their faces with the rest of the world watching.
Be careful what you wish for.
No shit. That sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your own face.
chokonen888 wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Yokohammer wrote:chokonen888 wrote:I'm starting to hope that they get the Olympic bid...and this bullshit they're selling as the best they can do blows up in their faces with the rest of the world watching.
Be careful what you wish for.
No shit. That sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your own face.
I didn't mean "literally" blows up...you can imagine all the Geiger counters that will come over with the Olympic hoard, now imagine the situation if someone finds some shit in the food, A/C unit, etc etc etc.
wagyl wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:wagyl wrote:Choko's current life plan has him outside of Tokyo by 2020....
True but we all know that shit ain't gonna last.
Hence "current"
chokonen888 wrote:...starting to hope that they get the Olympic bid...and this bullshit they're selling as the best they can do blows up in their faces with the rest of the world watching.
twitter wrote:Tokyo Olympic Committee Bombarded with Questions on Fukushima Water Leaks
---Jiji Press / 2013 Sept. 4
via Shogannai (@Shogannai) twitter September 5, 2013
chokonen888 wrote:LOL, love that print!
An entry point for some of the groundwater flooding the crippled Fukushima No. 1 plant has been found at reactor 1, according to Tokyo Electric Power Co.
Tepco will consider measures to halt or divert the water by conducting more surveys to determine exactly where it is entering. Cracks in the basement are considered a possibility.
An estimated 400 tons of toxic groundwater are flowing into the four damaged reactor units each day, compounding the volume of highly radioactive water being produced by the makeshift cooling apparatus set up after the triple core meltdowns of March 2011. The fuel inside must be submerged at all times to prevent it from igniting.
The groundwater is believed to be the primary source of the radioactive material entering the sea and potentially poses great danger to the environment.
The entry point is near a basement wall of unit 1′s turbine building, which is connected to and on the east side of the reactor building. Tepco workers found the entry point by drilling a hole into the ceiling of the basement and inserting a video camera, which captured images of water trickling from a point above the wall.
The water used to cool the fuel eventually flows into the turbine building, where it is believed to mingle with water intruding from outside.
The turbine building is also connected to an underground trench that runs toward the coast. Highly radioactive water from the trench is believed to be mixing with separate groundwater flows before entering the sea.
Coligny wrote:I could so be prime minister here... If it was the only skill needed...
The radiation level in Tokyo is the same as London, New York and Paris, like the major cities in the world. It’s absolutely safe.
South Korea banned all fishery imports from a swath of Japan around the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant on Friday, dealing another blow to Tokyo's credibility on the eve of the capital's bid to host the Olympics.
Just hours after Prime Minister Shinzo Abe broke away early from a global summit in Russia to personally back Tokyo's bid to host the 2020 Summer Games, Seoul extended a ban on 50 imports from eight Japanese prefectures, including Fukushima, due to concerns about radiation contamination.
"The measures are due to the sharply increased concern in the public about the flow of hundreds of metric tons (1 metric ton = 1.1023 tons) of contaminated water into the ocean at the site of the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan," a spokesman for the Prime Minister's office told reporters.
Korea's move, which takes effect on Monday, adds to international pressure on Japan to fix the crisis in Fukushima, 230 km (140 miles) from Tokyo.
China has banned the import of dairy, vegetable and seafood products from at least 5 Japanese prefectures, including Fukushima, since March 2011.
Fukushima's embattled operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co, has been forced to reverse denials and admit that 2 1/2 years after the reactor was wrecked by an earthquake and tsunami, it is leaking hundreds of metric tons of radioactive water a day into the Pacific Ocean and radiation levels have spiked.
Japan has struggled to assure the International Olympic Committee, meeting in Argentina, and the public at large that it can manage the Fukushima crisis.
Tokyo's bid for the Olympics is a high-stakes gamble for Abe and his "Abenomics" program. The right to host the games would likely boost Abe's popularity and could potentially spur his signature pro-growth policies for the world's third-biggest economy.
Abe's government stepped in this week, pledging nearly half a billion dollars to help Tokyo Electric Power Co try to contain the contaminated water.
Tokyo's Olympic bid chief on Wednesday played down fears over Fukushima, saying Tokyo's radiation level is comparable to London, Paris and New York.
Tokyo pushed back against the ban on Monday. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told a news conference that the water contamination is affecting only a very small area. Japan wants Korea to decide on Japanese imports based on scientific data.
Korea's extended fishery-import ban will remain in place indefinitely, Vice Fisheries Minister Son Jae-hak told the news briefing, saying information received from Japan was not good enough to properly judge the situation.
Seoul said it would also now tighten its testing on fishery imports from other areas of Japan...
Russell wrote:when some of those fuel rods start to burn.
wagyl wrote:Russell wrote:when some of those fuel rods start to burn.
OK, I'll bite. What makes you think some of the fuel rods might start to burn?
(Yes, I know I am talking to someone who seemed worried about pacu entering the Inland Sea. It is not important, but I never got a feel for whether that was a genuine concern.)
wagyl wrote:Russell wrote:when some of those fuel rods start to burn.
OK, I'll bite. What makes you think some of the fuel rods might start to burn?
(Yes, I know I am talking to someone who seemed worried about pacu entering the Inland Sea. It is not important, but I never got a feel for whether that was a genuine concern.)
Yokohammer wrote:wagyl wrote:Russell wrote:when some of those fuel rods start to burn.
OK, I'll bite. What makes you think some of the fuel rods might start to burn?
(Yes, I know I am talking to someone who seemed worried about pacu entering the Inland Sea. It is not important, but I never got a feel for whether that was a genuine concern.)
This is actually a legitimate concern.
If the rods get too close to each other or touch during the removal process, a reaction can start and that means heat.
Normally the removal process is handled by a precise computer controlled mechanism which is now unfortunately defunct. There's also a bunch of debris in the pool. I'm sure the greatest care will be taken, but the job will have to be done more or less manually. If there's an accident during removal ... like for example, a rod catches on a bit of debris in the pool and is dropped or even tilts and touches another rod ... there could be trouble.
It's not simply a matter of pulling the rods out of the pool under "normal" conditions. Obviously the people who will be doing the job understand that situation very well. The problem is that it's sort of unknown territory. I reckon there'll be a fair amount of fingernail biting and praying going on.
wagyl wrote:Yokohammer wrote:wagyl wrote:Russell wrote:when some of those fuel rods start to burn.
OK, I'll bite. What makes you think some of the fuel rods might start to burn?
(Yes, I know I am talking to someone who seemed worried about pacu entering the Inland Sea. It is not important, but I never got a feel for whether that was a genuine concern.)
This is actually a legitimate concern.
If the rods get too close to each other or touch during the removal process, a reaction can start and that means heat.
Normally the removal process is handled by a precise computer controlled mechanism which is now unfortunately defunct. There's also a bunch of debris in the pool. I'm sure the greatest care will be taken, but the job will have to be done more or less manually. If there's an accident during removal ... like for example, a rod catches on a bit of debris in the pool and is dropped or even tilts and touches another rod ... there could be trouble.
It's not simply a matter of pulling the rods out of the pool under "normal" conditions. Obviously the people who will be doing the job understand that situation very well. The problem is that it's sort of unknown territory. I reckon there'll be a fair amount of fingernail biting and praying going on.
Interesting. I will be the first to admit that I don't know the quantity of fuel in a fuel rod or its purity, but are you suggesting that there is not sufficient fuel in an isolated rod for sustain a reaction (which I would agree with) but there is in say three or four if they touch? Also my understanding was that fuel rod casings are pretty damn difficult to set alight.
Coligny wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spent_fuel_pool
Check the topic on risks and criticality.
Wiki, quoting US Nuclear Regulatory Commission wrote:The Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimates that many of the nuclear power plants in the United States will be out of room in their spent fuel pools by 2015, most likely requiring the use of temporary storage of some kind.
wagyl wrote:Coligny wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spent_fuel_pool
Check the topic on risks and criticality.
The biggest take-home from that isWiki, quoting US Nuclear Regulatory Commission wrote:The Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimates that many of the nuclear power plants in the United States will be out of room in their spent fuel pools by 2015, most likely requiring the use of temporary storage of some kind.
Yokohammer wrote:Seriously, this spent fuel removal thing is going to be delicate, even if there's no actual "burning" involved.
Yokohammer wrote:wagyl wrote:Coligny wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spent_fuel_pool
Check the topic on risks and criticality.
The biggest take-home from that isWiki, quoting US Nuclear Regulatory Commission wrote:The Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimates that many of the nuclear power plants in the United States will be out of room in their spent fuel pools by 2015, most likely requiring the use of temporary storage of some kind.
Yes. this is one of the big unknowns of nuclear power. There is still no effective means of "neutralising" the spent fuel, other than storing it somewhere for however long it takes the radiation to decay to safe levels (i.e. a very, very long time). Storage takes space, requires constant maintenance (i.e. it costs money ... forever), and it is dangerous.
Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests