Russell wrote:So, if she is innocent, she will be restored to her job?
Not likely..........
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Russell wrote:So, if she is innocent, she will be restored to her job?
matsuki wrote:I just have a problem with the SOP and 23day detention, especially after they already announced they had no plans to press charges.
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Japan is Fucked!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How Dare they arrest and detain an (admitted) lawbreaker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kurogane wrote:I think the legal sticking point was intent (which amazed me)
kurogane wrote:It's that obvious contradiction that sticks
Reporter: But she has admitted to sending herself the drugs
Jpn POPO: Yes. This is a very serious offence. Yet we have no proof of criminal intent.
Reporter: BUT she admits she sent herself the drugs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jpn POPO: Yes. This is a very serious offence which we are investigating thoroughly.
it might be a case of the prosecutors taking mercy or it might be that they really didn't have enough evidence to take it to trial.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:As for Hamp's confession I'm not sure that we know what she admitted to. The reports in the news haven't exactly been consistent so it might be a case of the prosecutors taking mercy or it might be that they really didn't have enough evidence to take it to trial. My guess is it's a little bit of both.
matsuki wrote:Kuro/SJ- I get what you're saying about slapping her on the wrist instead of a full on bitchslap with charges....but speaking from experience, you're giving them far too much credit for thought here. If they had found more oxy at her workplace or residence....or found any e-mails between her and her father, requesting he send the oxy, she wouldn't have been released without charges.
Salty wrote:it also ensures that the police have the best possible opportunity to find the evidence and charge those who did the crime
matsuki wrote:Salty wrote:They didn't charge her...meaning they didn't find shit....
kurogane wrote:The dumb junkie F'edUp so royally it's comical, she got what she deserved, and Japan wins again. They do modern industrial society better. Get used to it.
Russell wrote:?!?
Taro Toporific wrote:The Kennedy touch: Ambassador helps Toyota exec go free
U.S. ambassador to Japan played an active role in helping Julie Hamp, an official said.
USA TODAY 2:46 p.m. EDT July 8, 2015
Caroline Kennedy, the U.S. ambassador to Japan, helped secure former Toyota executive Julie Hamp's release from jail after the automaker's global communications chief became entangled in a drug case, an American official with direct knowledge of the discussions told USA TODAY.
Hamp, who was arrested on suspicion that she illegally imported prescription drugs into the country, was released Wednesday after Japanese prosecutors decided not to press charges. She immediately jumped on a plane to return to the U.S.
Kennedy's active role in the case — which was not previously disclosed —- involved advising Toyota officials and discussing the matter with Japanese authorities, said the official, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of such international diplomacy issues.
More...
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Seriously, Matsuki? Unless her father sent the package without her knowledge how could she be completely innocent?
Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Seriously, Matsuki? Unless her father sent the package without her knowledge how could she be completely innocent?
Exactly. It's one of those "We have judged it's not in the public interest to pursue this prosecution" decisions. Her status, Toyota's status, the US ambassador and the fact she agreed to jump straight on a plane never to return all played a part.
If you or I pulled the same stunt it could be very different.
Sakae Komori, a lawyer who frequently handles drug-related cases, said it’s difficult to figure out why someone is charged or not charged. Suspects with smaller amounts of the same drug have been charged, he said.
“This is seen as a very serious crime in Japan,” he said, acknowledging that the decision may invite allegations of unfairness. “Perhaps the authorities see her as already facing enough social punishment, and she was not judged a drug abuser.”
Toyota is such a powerful company in Japan that anything it does, or anything that happens to it, can be seen as setting a precedent.
Komori said Hamp’s resignation from Toyota could have helped in winning her release.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Matsuki, you don't seem to have a grasp of basic legal principles. Even if she's not a junky and had a legitimate reason (at least by American medical standards) for wanting the Oxy, she still broke the law if she knew the package was being sent. It's possible they dropped the charges because they couldn't prove she knew and it's also possible they dropped the charges because they didn't think it was worth pursuing.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:And if you think cops and prosecutors can't be influenced by Toyota or Ambassador Kennedy not to mention potentially Japanese politicians, you're living in la-la land.
Samurai_Jerk wrote: she still broke the law if she knew the package was being sent.
matsuki wrote:It's as you say, it's illegal to import the drug, regardless of the reason/intent. Where have I argued otherwise? As to who can be held accountable (charged for importing illegal drugs) for drugs like this sent from overseas, the sender, the courier service (yeah, it's happened for this specific category of crime...ask UPS)...but a recipient that wasn't also the sender and didn't order the drugs online and didn't pack the package herself being charged because they were aware of what was sent to them? That's a stretch dude.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Which part is a stretch? That they could prove she had knowledge or that they would nail her for having the knowledge if they could prove it? The receiver can certainly be held accountable even if they never let her take possession of the package.
matsuki wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Which part is a stretch? That they could prove she had knowledge or that they would nail her for having the knowledge if they could prove it? The receiver can certainly be held accountable even if they never let her take possession of the package.
I forgot about the case Kuro mentioned where some dude's friend mailed him something without his knowledge and he still was charged/convicted....so my argument is pointless, guilty even if you had no knowledge of what was sent to you. TIJ
In a brief document accompanying her release Wednesday, prosecutors said Hamp and her father together sent the package from the United States to Japan. The statement said the tablets were "hidden" inside the package.
Local news media reported earlier that Hamp had told police that she needed the pills for knee pain and that she was not aware that she had violated Japanese law.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests