Jail time for sharing a dildo... who woulda thunk it?
http://blogs.new.spectator.co.uk/2015/1 ... coming-to/
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
kurogane wrote:If the basis of the harsh sentence was the fraud element, then sure, yeah. It reminds me of the charge that Lord Wikleaks is under: sex by misprepresentation. The problem is the judge seems like a twat, and is hardly uniform in his punishment of sex offenders (he gave half that for a guy that was a 13 yr old teeny fecker). As for fooling the poor girl that got it, most pics of the accused show she could easily man up, and seems to have Man Hands. What she did was creepy enough that she desrves almost anything a judge will throw at her, and the militant panty liners are not going to help their cause defending her the way they are. How they can even pretend this is a gender identity issue shocks even my reduced disbelief of their constant pantywetting. My gender is Japanese, but I don't expect everybody to know that offhand.
This will get reduced on appeal anyways, so yeah, good. Bye. Liar Liar, prosthetic penis on fire.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests