Hot Topics | |
---|---|
matsuki wrote:What is Hon Hai's motivation for buying such a huge, shrinking ship?
matsuki wrote:What is Hon Hai's motivation for buying such a huge, shrinking ship?
Takechanpoo wrote:im pretty sure if hon hai was korean, j-netouyos would hysterically find fault with this purchasing. but fortunately(?), its taiwanese. almost no netouyos are opposing to it.![]()
Taro Toporific wrote:Wall Street Journal http://www.wsj.com
6:18 PM - 25 Feb 2016
Breaking: Foxconn said it is delaying the signing of a takeover agreement with Sharp
Russell wrote:I don't care one way or the other. Never had good experiences with their products.
matsuki wrote:l really like their displays and plasmacluster tech...the rest, not so special
Sent from my SO-03H using Tapatalk
But saving zombie companies could stifle Japan’s global competitiveness in the long run.
If Japan’s bailouts remind you of the U.S.'s rescue of its auto companies, you’re not alone. There is a strong argument that the auto bailouts only delayed the day when General Motors and Chrysler lose out to nimbler competitors like Tesla Motors. But there are also some important differences. The U.S. auto bailouts were undertaken in the middle of a deep recession, and are highly unlikely to be repeated. Japan’s bank- and government-led bailouts come all the time, repeatedly, during normal economic times. Additionally, U.S. startups such as Tesla can look to capital markets for funding, while Japanese finance is dominated by large government-backed banks that want to preserve the supremacy of their large zombie clients. So while the U.S. bailouts might have hurt productivity somewhat, the situation in Japan is just much, much worse.
Taiwan’s Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. boss Terry Gou wasted little time addressing his newly acquired employees at Sharp Corp., warning of job cuts while promising to reward workers who put their “heart and soul” into rebuilding one of the world’s iconic brands.
After Sharp’s results were released Thursday, in which the Japanese consumer electronics company posted a second straight annual loss, Gou, the chairman of the firm also known as Foxconn Technology Group, said in a letter to staff: “It is with a heavy heart that I say to you the results were subpar.”
A “close review of the company’s operations” highlighted a “level of inefficiency throughout Sharp,” and therefore a “very regrettable need” to reduce the workforce, he wrote.
The net loss at Osaka-based Sharp widened to ¥256 billion ($2.35 billion) in the year that ended in March from a loss of ¥222.3 billion a year earlier. That compares with the ¥161 billion loss expected by analysts.
Sharp’s struggle with deteriorating demand for its consumer electronics and displays has resulted in more than $12 billion in net losses over the past five years and raised doubts about its ability to survive as a going concern. Gou, who has built a fortune assembling devices for others, including Apple Inc., spent four years chasing the Japanese company before winning control with a $3.5 billion deal in March. He is now facing the task of reviving a company that makes products ranging from household appliances and solar panels to office equipment.
“My hope is all the necessary reviews and procedures will be completed swiftly and without issue so we can all get down to the important job of turning this great company around and helping it return to a global leadership position,” Gou wrote in the letter obtained by Bloomberg.
Once the workforce is trimmed, the company will put in place a “performance-based appraisal system designed to reward every Sharp employee who is truly committed to his/her work, putting heart and soul into everything he/she does,” according to the letter. Wage cuts and reductions in yearend bonuses are “a thing of the past.”
More
Once the workforce is trimmed, the company will put in place a “performance-based appraisal system designed to reward every Sharp employee who is truly committed to his/her work, putting heart and soul into everything he/she does,” according to the letter. Wage cuts and reductions in yearend bonuses are “a thing of the past.”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests