Hot Topics | |
---|---|
canman wrote:I need some advice on something that just happened. For the second time in a few weeks I had an inner ear infection. Went to the ENT guy, who I dislike, since he whispers, and when you have an ear infection and you can't hear in the first place, it is all the more maddening. Anyway, he guy me a script for meds, which I took over the pharmacy next door. They fill the prescription and home I come. Started taking the medicine before dinner last night, woke up today with a headache and felt I was squinting to be able to read stuff, but thought, well its part of the ear problem. Went to work, and didn't feel great, but powered through, when I got home, my wife said somebody had called but didn't leave a message, but she didn't recognize the number. Just a little while ago, we get a call, it is from the pharmacy telling me to stop taking the medicine, they made a mistake. They gave me some hormone treatment medicine, instead of inner ear infection medicine. The pharmacist just came to deliver the new meds, but with hardly any apology or anything. My wife said why didn't you leave a message and say stop earlier, and the guys weak ass excuse, we don't know how to speak English! My wife let him have it, and then he started to apologize. Is there anything I can or should do? Do I report them, or just suck it up? I'm not a happy camper about this!
canman wrote:my wife said somebody had called but didn't leave a message, but she didn't recognize the number
canman wrote: Is there anything I can or should do? Do I report them, or just suck it up? I'm not a happy camper about this!
canman wrote:My wife is going to call the clinic and inform them what happened, then contact the pharmacy and see what they say. I'm not out for any monetary gain or anything, I just want them to be more careful.
matsuki wrote:If you start growing moobs and notice some shrinkage...
canman wrote:Quick update. My wife called the doctor and explained what happened. He assured her that even though I was given incorrect medicine, there was no risk to me. But, if I was worried I could go in for testing. Not sure what kind of tests. Then another pharmacist came to the house to apologize, and the president of the pharmacy is coming at 5:00pm. We will see what he has to say!
By the way no moobs, only had blurred vision and a headache. But could also be ear infection related.
Yep, them and no-one else, so they can keep it "in the family". I'd move on to someplace else.canman wrote:to call them at once.
canman wrote:The meds I took were hormone treatment for menopausal women.
Wage Slave wrote:That all sounds extremely sensible. And it's very refreshing to see someone not going full drama queen/give me money over something like this. Power to your elbow.
Wage Slave wrote:That all sounds extremely sensible. And it's very refreshing to see someone not going full drama queen/give me money over something like this. Power to your elbow.
Wage Slave wrote:And it's very refreshing to see someone not going full drama queen/give me money over something like this.
Medication errors happen all the time, an estimated one million each year, contributing to 7,000 deaths.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Interestingly enough I just happened to hear this fact on a podcast yesterday.Medication errors happen all the time, an estimated one million each year, contributing to 7,000 deaths.
That's in the US. Apparently one of the causes over the years has been doctors' famously bad handwriting. Tech is helping reduce that though.
Mike Oxlong wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Interestingly enough I just happened to hear this fact on a podcast yesterday.Medication errors happen all the time, an estimated one million each year, contributing to 7,000 deaths.
That's in the US. Apparently one of the causes over the years has been doctors' famously bad handwriting. Tech is helping reduce that though.
In Japan any prescriptions are printed out and delivered to the pharamacy, so they don't have the bad handwriting excuse.
Wage Slave wrote:Mike Oxlong wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Interestingly enough I just happened to hear this fact on a podcast yesterday.Medication errors happen all the time, an estimated one million each year, contributing to 7,000 deaths.
That's in the US. Apparently one of the causes over the years has been doctors' famously bad handwriting. Tech is helping reduce that though.
In Japan any prescriptions are printed out and delivered to the pharamacy, so they don't have the bad handwriting excuse.
Medication errors happen everywhere in the world. It's just a function of the sheer number of prescriptions written a year, the increasing range of medications and humans being, well, human beings. We can reduce the number but will never eliminate it completely. So yes, review of systems and checking is always needed, mistakes where they happen need to be investigated for root cause but it isn't realistic to demand zero errors and I don't believe any country can claim anything such.
Mike Oxlong wrote:Wage Slave wrote:Mike Oxlong wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Interestingly enough I just happened to hear this fact on a podcast yesterday.Medication errors happen all the time, an estimated one million each year, contributing to 7,000 deaths.
That's in the US. Apparently one of the causes over the years has been doctors' famously bad handwriting. Tech is helping reduce that though.
In Japan any prescriptions are printed out and delivered to the pharamacy, so they don't have the bad handwriting excuse.
Medication errors happen everywhere in the world. It's just a function of the sheer number of prescriptions written a year, the increasing range of medications and humans being, well, human beings. We can reduce the number but will never eliminate it completely. So yes, review of systems and checking is always needed, mistakes where they happen need to be investigated for root cause but it isn't realistic to demand zero errors and I don't believe any country can claim anything such.
Some sort of system to reduce / prevent errors from happening would be nice to see.
Features of Japanese Health Care Affecting Law
Health care in Japan is provided on a price-controlled, fee-for-service basis. Since 1961, all legal residents (including noncitizens) have been covered by national health insurance [1, 7]. The percentage of the GDP allocated to health care in 2004 was 8%, compared with 15.2% in the United States and 7.4% to 11.5% in other Western nations [33]. This relative efficiency in provision of care has not entailed any substantial sacrifice in technology advancement; the level of technology in top Japanese hospitals parallels practices worldwide. Japanese longevity is among the world’s best, and infant mortality statistics are excellent [34]. Much credit for these achievements goes to health-promoting lifestyle factors, but the healthcare system contributes as well [1].
Traditionally, with respect to physician-patient relationships, a paternalistic paradigm prevailed in Japan. The creed of medieval Japan’s feudal lords in ruling their subjects—“Keep them ignorant and dependent”—was often ironically applied to doctors’ methods of managing patients [31]. Customary practice hid cancer diagnoses from patients, withheld information about prescription drugs, refused access to their medical records, and sometimes conditioned provision of medical treatment on waiver of the right to sue or complain [19].
However, principles of transparency have gained traction in Japan since the 1990s following a scandal of HIV-contaminated blood transfusions [3] and enactment of freedom of information [17] and medical records access measures [18]. Recently, coverups of medical error at hospitals of high repute received front page coverage in Japanese media, and public distrust of the previously sacrosanct medical profession has become a topic of national concern [21].
The Japanese healthcare establishment stood ill-prepared to address this public questioning. Institutional structures to monitor quality of care have been weak. Professional licensure and discipline authority, exercised by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, seldom inquired into failures of medical safety. Peer review was the exception, not the rule. Few hospitals conducted morbidity and mortality conferences. Medical education’s hierarchical structure discouraged questioning of practices taught by revered professors with control over employment placements, even when those practices were unsupported by good empiric data [1]. The hospital accreditation system has fostered improvement only marginally; a voluntary accreditation system does exist, but accreditation is unnecessary to qualify for reimbursement for procedures performed or drugs prescribed. Less than one-third (2523 of 8832) of hospitals are accredited [9], and in any case, accreditation criteria do not address compliance with standards of evidence-based medicine or honesty with patients about adverse events. Physicians can advertise specialty expertise and practice in specialty fields without specialty certification [6]. These weaknesses in professional accountability structures have channeled public attention toward legal institutions regulating medical quality.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628506/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests