Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Big Boy hot topic Where The Hell Did Everyone Go?
Buraku hot topic Tourette's, Miyazaki-style
Coligny hot topic Looking for the Japanese Elon Musk
Coligny hot topic Hong Kong Tourists in Fatal Hokkaido Car Crash
Buraku hot topic 'Paris Syndrome' strikes Japanese
Buraku hot topic Nigerians to be banned in Tokyo's Shinjuku Ward
Buraku hot topic There'll be fewer cows getting off that Qantas flight
Buraku hot topic K-Pop Songwriter Racist Rant: World Better Without Black People, Whitney No Big Loss
Buraku hot topic Hollywood Marvel DC flop, SK drama, Anime, Manga dominates
Buraku hot topic Japanese jazz pianist beaten up on NYC subway
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Postby cstaylor » Sun Jul 14, 2002 12:41 pm

There is no positive side to this decision. Sounds like Britain is moving even closer to a police state:

And the so-called double jeopardy rule, where a defendant cannot be tried twice for the same offence, could also be abolished.

Other measures in the White Paper on the reform of the criminal justice system include proposals to reduce the numbers of middle class people who exempt themselves from jury service because of work obligations
How are they going to do this? By not having a jury?
According to reports, the reforms, intended to improve conviction rates, will include new police powers to impose bail conditions, including electronic tagging, on suspects who have yet to be charged.
This isn't a statistics game... who cares about "conviction rates"... if the person is guilty, then they are guilty, but this article makes it sound like a high convinction rate is good (on the contrary, it shows that the State has nothing dampening its power over the people)
User avatar
cstaylor
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:07 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan
  • Website
Top

no trial by jury isn't necissarily bad...

Postby befamfivh » Sun Jul 14, 2002 1:35 pm

I'd rather have a well-educated well-informed and impartial judge decide my fate than 6 or 12 possibly ignorant and dissinterested peers...

On the other hand, if the judge is motivated by some political agenda (as almost all judges are to some extent here in the states thanks to democracy) and the accused doesn't fit in with that agenda... well that would be really bad.
befamfivh
Maezumo
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 12:15 pm
Location: sakado ... saitama
Top

Re: no trial by jury isn't necissarily bad...

Postby cstaylor » Sun Jul 14, 2002 1:39 pm

befamfivh wrote:I'd rather have a well-educated well-informed and impartial judge decide my fate than 6 or 12 possibly ignorant and dissinterested peers...
As long as the juries are chosen properly (I've been on jury duty once, and boy, do they screen possible jury members), it is statistically more likely that the accused will receive a fairer outcome than the response of a single judge.

befamfivh wrote:On the other hand, if the judge is motivated by some political agenda (as almost all judges are to some extent here in the states thanks to democracy) and the accused doesn't fit in with that agenda... well that would be really bad.
Understatement of the year... and by removing juries we remove the citizen from deciding the fate of the accused... very scary stuff. 8O
User avatar
cstaylor
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:07 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan
  • Website
Top


Post a reply
3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group