Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Multiculturalism on the rise?
Buraku hot topic Whats with all the Iranians?
Buraku hot topic Swapping Tokyo For Greenland
Buraku hot topic Japan Not Included in Analyst's List Of Top US Allies
Buraku hot topic Dutch wives for sale
Buraku hot topic Tokyo cab reaches NY from Argentina, meter running
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic Stupid Youtube cunts cashing in on Logan Paul fiasco
Buraku hot topic Japanese Can't Handle Being Fucked In Paris
Buraku hot topic MARS...Let's Go!
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Japan Anthropologist Studies US Japan Anthropologists

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
5 posts • Page 1 of 1

Japan Anthropologist Studies US Japan Anthropologists

Postby Mulboyne » Mon Jul 26, 2004 6:48 am

Saturday's Asahi/IHT had an interview with Takami Kuwayama on the books page but I don't see an online version (probably somewhere). I've read his book and he has good points to make.
He thinks that the US anthropology "Japan Specialists" are now so numerous that they can conduct academic dialogues about Japan among themselves and use their Japanese contacts as "informants" rather than seeing them as having intellectual opinions worth valuing.
Here's some of the article:
"What was interesting to my American students about Japan," mused anthropogist Takami Kuwayama in a recent interview, "was not interesting to me at all"
...Among the spices of Kuwayama's conversation - and of [his book] "Native Anthroplogy" - is his amiable disdain for the failure of American anthroplogists to transcend, or even perceive, their ingrained American prejudices regarding Japan.
...[Dorinne] Kondo, he argues, writes [in "Crafting Selves"] for Americans who take the rugged individualism of American culture as a natural human standard, anything deviating from which is seen as peculiar - and therefore suitable for anthropological study. But to a Japanese, the subordination of the individual is as natural as individualism is to an American.
"Indeed," Kuwayama notes, "'Crafting Selves' would make an ideal target for the persisitent Japanese criticism that foreigners' writings on Japan are boring because, to a Japanese, they are merely common sense."


Kuwayama's book is a good one. He is very aware that some pockets of Japanese anthropology are home to nationalists with an agenda but points out that this is true in many countries. France and Germany have their fair share of that strand of thought. He also has an analysis of US anthropology textbooks and highlights their hilariously inappropriate use of photographs and muses on the predominance of pics of girls in kimono. My favourite is the book that writes that blind people in Japan have an uniquely better route to literacy than sighted compatriots because they only have to learn Braille while everyone else struggles with kanji and kana.

The Trans Pacific Press has a good series of anthropology texts but, sadly, like most academic books, these are all around 5-6000 yen a throw even in paperback. Two other good ones are "Hegemony of Homogenity: An Anthropological Analysis of Nihonjinron" by Harumi Befu and "A Genealogy of 'Japanese' Self-Images" by Eiji Oguma.

If you really want to hit your wallet, try Ryang's "Japan and National Anthropology" for nearly 20,000 yen. Published by Routledge in hardback. That takes a look at why Japanese and US anthropologists are hopeless at working with each other.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby jingai » Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:01 am

This article is quite interesting- I've been curious about the divide between foreigners studying about Japanese culture, history, and politics versus how it is perceived domestically. There has to be a gap, though I'm not sure that there is anything wrong with that, as some of the best critiques of America aren't by Americans (de Toqueville...)

One book I thought transcended the problems Kuriyama pointed out is "Importing Diversity," a study of the JET program. As the subject of the book itself, the JET Program, crosses cultural barriers, the book is more self-aware than simply "Japan is X compared to America which is Y." The surprising conclusions the author draws about the fundamental similarities between Japanese and American culture makes it worth the read!
User avatar
jingai
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2002 2:34 pm
Location: Sendai
Top

Postby Big Booger » Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:35 am

WHo cares.. LOL I'm kidding of course. I think what is different from one is in fact peculiar to another.. Why would they come to Japan to write about similarities when differences (that are compared to the native country), are what really catches one's eye..

Of course an anthropologist should indeed learned to be objective and see beyond these simple comparisons...

As jingai states, finding similarities can be equally entertaining but a true study would balance the similarities with the differences, trying to paint a more balanced picture..

It's that stupid kimono stereotype that most foreigners see abroad.. I believed honestly 10 years ago, that Japanese all wore kimono.. naive I know.

What do Japanese Anthropologists study when their subject is America? I'm keen to know what they are thinking.
My Blog
User avatar
Big Booger
 
Posts: 4150
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 8:56 am
Location: A giant bugger hole
  • Website
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Wed Jul 28, 2004 2:12 am

One of the points that Kuwayama makes is that the "center of anthroplogy thinking", broadly speaking, the English speaking world, does not regard itself as a subject for anthropological study. Social Studies and linguistic studies are common but true anthropology still seems to be directed at "the other". So US researchers are comfortable conducting "anthroplogy" analyses of Japan, Aborigines, Chinese, Bedouin, Ainu, Inuit etc but not of English, Australians etc which, instead, are classified as social studies. So, to grossly simplify his thinking, he takes the view that looking at US "anthropology" studies of Japan is a useful indicator of what the US etc regards as "the other" and so is a useful anthropology tool to look at the US.
So can we solve the dichotomy if we agree to classifly all comparative analyses as "social studies"? In theory, yes but that places a greater onus on anthropologists to acknowledge the subject matter as intellectual equals and not "informants".
Kuwayama writes of a conference in America when one US anthropologist looked at grief and personal relationships and decided to use the example of reactions to the death of a anthroplogist that everyone knew. The audience became very hostile and thought it was inappropriate to use the death as a subject for study. The anthroplogist's reaction was "That's my point!" which went down like a lead balloon. Everyone thought they had the right to be considered a contributor and not an "informant" or "source" in the matter at hand.
Kuwayama reckoned this was the first time that he saw a conference realize what it was like to be studied. In the same way, he thinks that Japanese anthropology is seen as something to be studied rather than a genuine contribution to the debate - a situation which (primarily) US anthropologists are not willing to concede.
He has his fair share of critics

Suitable subject for anthropology study?
Try this:
FG Thread on God Knows What
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:57 pm

He also has an analysis of US anthropology textbooks and highlights their hilariously inappropriate use of photographs and muses on the predominance of pics of girls in kimono. My favourite is the book that writes that blind people in Japan have an uniquely better route to literacy than sighted compatriots because they only have to learn Braille while everyone else struggles with kanji and kana.

Here's a PDF version of an earlier paper written by Kuwayama which covers some of this material.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top


Post a reply
5 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group