The "Save the Whales" ethos is almost unquestioned, and Norwegians and Japanese risk becoming pariahs by continuing to salivate when they see a nice juicy whale
And does he think that the Japanese can tell the difference *before* they catch them?The bottom line is that while most large whales remain at risk, for some species we can no longer argue that we need to "save the whales." They've been saved.

But that is dangerous ground. It is culinary imperialism for us to tell Norwegians and Japanese that because we like whales, they must not eat them.
...and from the reader's comment page (A New Look at 'Save the Whales'):
Evidence exists that most whales are sentient creatures of quite a high order. We are motivated to protect whales from slaughter because we recognize in them elements of our own humanity, and we sympathize with their plight.
This situation is perpetuated by political lobbying and intentionally misleading public campaigns by nongovernmental organizations that raise millions of dollars a year with their anti-whaling rhetoric.
DAN GOODMAN
Tokyo, Aug. 20, 2002
The writer is a councilor at the Institute of Cetacean Research
Oh yeah, Dan's not biased by his lovely paycheck... "research"... yeah, right. "Hmmm... minke on dutch crunch tastes much better than rye bread".
