Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic 'Paris Syndrome' strikes Japanese
Buraku hot topic
Buraku hot topic Japan will fingerprint and photograph all foreigners!
Buraku hot topic Live Action "Akira" Update
Buraku hot topic Debito reinvents himself as a Uyoku movie star!
Buraku hot topic Steven Seagal? Who's that?
Buraku hot topic Best Official Japan Souvenirs
Buraku hot topic Multiculturalism on the rise?
Buraku hot topic As if gaijin men didn't have a bad enough reputation...
Buraku hot topic Swapping Tokyo For Greenland
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

FG Firms in Japan

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
8 posts • Page 1 of 1

FG Firms in Japan

Postby Mulboyne » Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:47 pm

User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Re: FG Firms in Japan

Postby Captain Japan » Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:43 pm

User avatar
Captain Japan
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2537
Images: 0
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 10:19 am
Location: Fishin' in the Meguro River
Top

Postby GomiGirl » Thu Jun 09, 2005 4:15 pm

Captain Japan - this is big news around the foreign Chambers of Commerce. All of the heads of these organisations are getting together to draft proposed wording changes to the legislation.

It is one of the biggest things to rock the corporate world in Japan since Meiji Restoration times.

This is big big news. This is just the start and it will heat up very soon as the temperature rises this Summer.
GomiGirl
The Keitai Goddess!!!
User avatar
GomiGirl
 
Posts: 9129
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: Roamin' with my fave 12"!!
  • Website
Top

Postby gomichild » Thu Jun 09, 2005 4:33 pm

*edited*
gomichild's ramblings - Cerebral Soup | flickr | Womb Quake
User avatar
gomichild
 
Posts: 2371
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 1:23 am
Location: FNQ
  • Website
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:24 pm

Link may expire so whole story posted

FT via Yahoo: Japan law could cost foreign investment banks
Japan's Ministry of Justice has refused to amend a controversial bill that could cost international investment banks hundreds of millions of dollars, making it likely that the proposed law will be passed unchanged by the upper house of parliament this week, lawyers said. The move is a severe blow for the international business community, led by the American Chamber of Commerce, the European Business Council and the International Bankers Association, which lobbied the MoJ to amend the proposed law.

The dispute is over article 821 of the commercial code, which deals with companies that do business in Japan but are incorporated offshore. Most foreign investment banks run their Japan operations through a branch but are incorporated elsewhere. Approval in the upper house would, from April 2006, make so-called quasi-foreign companies illegal and force them to re-incorporate in Japan, a process that could take up to 18 months and trigger hefty administrative costs the EBC estimates at "hundreds of millions of euros".

"The new corporation law including article 821 is likely to be passed this week, possibly even on Wednesday. There seems to be not much political will to be flexible. There will be no amendment. It will not be changed," one lawyer said. Discussions over the proposed changes have infuriated international investment banks, many of whom may now be forced to reincorporate, despite an apparent "get-out clause" designed by the MoJ to try to offset the consequences of the changes.

The MoJ has offered a "favourable interpretation" of the bill that it claims means most international companies will not have to re-incorporate. The ministry has stated in a Diet session that any company that does business only in Japan would not be treated as a quasi-foreign company "if it has a plan to do business overseas". The lawyer said: "The key question then becomes 'what constitutes a plan?' On this there has been no guidance."

The MoJ has claimed this favourable interpretation shows it has listened to the concerns of the business community, but lawyers said this "solution" provides no certainty as there is no guarantee the MoJ's interpretation will always be the official interpretation. At a meeting last Thursday between the FSA and the international investment banks, the regulator sought to reassure the banks that the MoJ's solution should provide them with "comfort" but bankers in Tokyo said they were not reassured.

They said that in the past authorities in Japan have selectively interpreted rules and regulations to penalise foreign companies, providing international investment banks with no assurance that they should trust their future legal status to the MoJ's interpretation. The MOJ declined to comment.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby omae mona » Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:42 pm

Mulboyne wrote:FT via Yahoo: Japan law could cost foreign investment banks
Japan's Ministry of Justice has refused to amend a controversial bill that could cost international investment banks hundreds of millions of dollars, making it likely that the proposed law will be passed unchanged by the upper house of parliament this week, lawyers said. .


Crap. One more blow to Omae Mona's chances of ever getting himself back on The Package.
Taro Toporific wrote:No PACKAGE. No come.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby Tsuru » Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:17 pm

What is this bill for anyway?
"Doing engineering calculations with the imperial system is like wiping your ass with acorns, it works, but it's painful and stupid."

"Plus, it's British."

- Nameless
User avatar
Tsuru
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:08 am
Location: Farcical Blingboddery
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:31 pm

Tsuru wrote:What is this bill for anyway?

Tax, I would assume. Ripplewood's profits on Shinsei Bank went largely untaxed since most of the investment vehicles were offshore. It would also allow the regulators a closer look at what business is being conducted by investment banks and hedge funds. Although the FT focuses on financial companies, there are a whole range of industries likely to be affected by the change.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top


Post a reply
8 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group