Hot Topics | |
---|---|
IOL.co.za wrote:
An animal rights group on Friday won the right to sue a Japanese whaling company for allegedly killing hundreds of whales inside an Australian reserve.
Last year, the Federal Court denied Humane Society International permission to sue Japanese whaling company Kyodo Senpaku for allegedly slaughtering around 400 minke whales in Antarctic waters that the Australian government has declared a whale sanctuary.
But on Friday the Federal Court overturned that decision, saying the judge had incorrectly taken political considerations into account.
In the original ruling, Federal Court judge James Allsop held that Australia cannot legally block the company from hunting in international waters protected by Australia because Tokyo does not recognize Australia's jurisdiction there.
Humane Society International appealed the decision to the full court, and Allsop's two colleagues on the bench found that he had relied too heavily on a government submission claiming the proposed lawsuit would harm Australia's relations with Japan.
"We are also persuaded that the primary judge was in error in attaching weight to what we would characterize as a political consideration," Chief Justice Michael Black and Justice Ray Finkelstein said in their judgment.
"It may be accepted that whilst legal disputes may occur in a political context, the exclusively political dimension of the dispute" cannot be resolved in the courts, the judgment said.
A spokeswoman for Humane Society International, Nicola Beynon, said the organization would file an injunction against Kyodo Senpaku sometime next week, and hopes to resolve the matter before the whale-hunting season begins in December.
. . . Kyodo Senpaku could not immediately be reached for comment . . . more
me wrote:
If it's obvious that whale numbers cannot support commercial whaling by everyone at once but, arguably, numbers of some whales may support whaling by a couple of nations, shouldn't those whaling nations compensate the ones who refrain?
Isn't the current position like an apple tree between your land and your neighbour's where they take all the apples every year?
The Adelaide Advertiser wrote:
JAPANESE fishermen have illegally caught more than $5 billion worth of tuna in the past 20 years, a major report shows.
The report by a special panel of the international Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna found that Japan's poaching amounted to an average of 8500 tonnes a year.
The over-fishing will be examined at a special meeting of the extended commission being held in Canberra today and tomorrow.
. . . Local tuna fishermen feel the scandal has the potential to be a bigger international issue than the slaughter of whales by Japanese fishermen.
The report has also shocked the Port Lincoln fishing community, after years of being told southern bluefin tuna stocks were at dangerously low levels . . . more
GomiGirl wrote:Useless factoid for today - have been to Port Lincoln a few months ago and was proudly told by the local taxi driver that there are more millionaires per capita in Port Lincoln than in any other Australian town or city. This is primarily because there are so many tuna fishermen there. (That and the abalone divers)
GomiGirl wrote:Useless factoid for today - have been to Port Lincoln a few months ago and was proudly told by the local taxi driver that there are more millionaires per capita in Port Lincoln than in any other Australian town or city. This is primarily because there are so many tuna fishermen there. (That and the abalone divers)
Yorik wrote:Another strange fact is that the Port Lincoln region has the highest density of White Pointer Sharks anywhere in the world.
gomichild wrote:Even more ironically was that the shark attack that happened closest to our visit was actually on the Gold Coast where it is supposedly safer from shark attack.......
GomiGirl wrote:It was a bull shark ...
Mike Oxlong wrote:Looks like the Aussie's have a plan step things up a bit
Buraku wrote:Bloody whale hunt off Japan shocks tourists: Report
Takechanpoo wrote:Aussie's Labour party seemed to had said Aussie army should dispatch planes to inspect J-whaling ship. If Aussie want to start war against us, we Japanese pleasurely accept it. When WW2, Aussie could had beated us because of Uncle Sam's army presence. Aussie army without Uncle Sam is like a baby compared with our Chrysanthemum army.
Takechanpoo wrote: <blah, blah, blah> . . . our Chrysanthemum army.
Some Idiot (Mission Leader Hajime Ishikawa) wrote:They're violent environmental terrorists.
Their violence is unforgivable ... we must fight against their hypocrisy and lies.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests