Hot Topics | |
---|---|
canman wrote:I have a question maybe GG can answer. How difficult or expensive is it for the phone companies to make most of their phones bilingual?
canman wrote:I would really like to know how many people really use all of the functions they have on their phones. Other than say email, the camera, calculator, calendar, or schedule.
IkemenTommy wrote:On the contrary, foreign phones (Nokia, SonyEriccson, Motorola, Apple, Samsung, etc) absolutely blow chunks in Japan. Why? Because they do not meet the network compatibility (ie. piss poor i-mode compatibility with the Android phone, lack of emoji expressions in iPhone), lack of Japan-specific features (1-seg TV viewing, IC reader), and meeting the consumers' demands (compact size, light weight, folding clamshell design).
I can think of Kyocera as another example besides SonyEriccson that, probably safe to say, attempted to go overseas but that failed miserably in doing so.
canman wrote:I have a question maybe GG can answer.
canman wrote:How difficult or expensive is it for the phone companies to make most of their phones bilingual? I'm pretty sure most phones have the capability to switch languages. Which is great for us foreigners, but I wonder do the cell phone makers in America have the capability to switch between French and Spanish?
klimmer wrote:If only they could make a longer lasting battery for the iPhone....
Mobile phone charges in Tokyo were the second highest in seven major cities in the world in fiscal 2008, up from fourth place last year due to the yen's appreciation, the communications ministry said Tuesday.
Tokyoites paid an average 27.7 yen for a minute of cellphone conversation, short of 32.0 yen paid by Parisians, according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. The lowest charge was 10.0 yen in New York.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests