Hot Topics | |
---|---|
AML wrote:Rolex is popular among oyajis.
The younger guys get Tag Heuer.
Personal I would get a Tag as they are more accurate.
dont know where omega fits.
But I agree with Taro. Less and less people buy them for practical use.
They are just a fashion accessory and not a practical product.
(sweaty J summer heat saw the end of the wrist watch for me)
AML wrote:Rolex is popular among oyajis.
The younger guys get Tag Heuer.
Personal I would get a Tag as they are more accurate.
gkanai wrote:I basically agree except for special cases like a 1000 M Seiko diver or other special-purpose quartz watch.
FG Lurker wrote:There are always exceptions. I wonder how many people who buy that Seiko diver actually use it for diving though...
IkemenTommy wrote:Does muff diving count?
Mulboyne wrote:If you plan on doing business with certain wealthy Chinese or Middle Eastern types, you'd better have an expensive watch or no watch when you see them for the first time.
FG Lurker wrote:What would an acceptable watch be in those circles? I suspect something $20k+?
Mulboyne wrote:If you plan on doing business with certain wealthy Chinese or Middle Eastern types, you'd better have an expensive watch or no watch when you see them for the first time. A colleague of mine nearly ripped my arm off trying to get rid of the cheap Swatch she spotted on my wrist as we were heading up in a lift to a meeting a few years ago.
Greji wrote:What you got against English teachers Joe? The fact that most of them talk like Yankees bother you?
Mulboyne wrote:If you plan on doing business with certain wealthy Chinese or Middle Eastern types, you'd better have an expensive watch or no watch when you see them for the first time. A colleague of mine nearly ripped my arm off trying to get rid of the cheap Swatch she spotted on my wrist as we were heading up in a lift to a meeting a few years ago.
nikoneko wrote:Would my Suunto qualify simply because they are so badass?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest