
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:It doesn't surprise me in the least that a fascist, Chrstian fundamentalist mass murderer would have some affinity of the likes of those gentlemen.
I didn't notice the headline comma at first and my initial thought was "WTF does this bloke want with a deceased American sports broadcaster?"
Also thought the stories were funny and highlight the shared insularity of Japan and Australia in that their respective media react this way. Both so desperate for recognition on a global scale they willingly associate themselves with razed mass murderers.
Shite, I should get a PhD in sociiology for this post. Maybe I should say something about birds and get another one in Feminist Studies, too?
xenomorph42 wrote:There was no proof that this loon was a Christian fundamentalist at least in the sense that he killed those people in the name of God. Just saying...
Not like the crazy islamists that go around shouting "Allah Akbar!" which is in the name of God. This guy was saying that he praised Japanese mono-culture and wanted Europe to halt islamic expansion throughout the European continent which is/was mostly Christian. But then again, Mussolini though he was a Christian too.
i wonder what his facebook and twitter look like...Samurai_Jerk wrote:He apparetly was pretty active on fundamentalist websites in the past too. I'm not sure how much of that is media exaggeration though.
IparryU wrote:i wonder what his facebook and twitter look like...
Kill all non-whites!
2triky wrote:Funny that notwithstanding his "manifesto" he blasted a bunch of pure Caucasian, Arayan types in an effort to spark revolution.
He may have espoused a fascist ideology, but his antecedents in the 5th SS Panzer "Wiking" Division wouldn't have approved.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:He bombed a government office and killed a bunch of kids at a Labor Party youth camp so in his mind he was attacking the problem: the left-wing political party currently in power.
2triky wrote:Fair enough, but according to his world view the gist of the problem was the infiltration of Islam...you will not gain much fans but killing the people you're trying to convince. Even the Unabomber directed his animus at people at he thought were the source of the problem.
In any event, I get what you're saying.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:You're looking for logical thinking from a guy who bombed a government office and went on a shooting spree at a youth camp?
2triky wrote:Indeed. There is no logic to be found. Having said that, those he detested (i.e. Muslims) are much more pointed in their disapproval when it comes to terrorist acts. Merely trying to point out the irony.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Really? A Muslim blowing himself up in market full of random Muslim men, women and children is "more pointed"?
2triky wrote:WTC bombing 1993. November 17, 1997 –]
Considering Tanzania has a pretty big Muslim population and most of the people killed were Tanzanians, they probably could have figured on killing some Muslims. And London, are you fucking kidding me?I'm not seeking logic...I'm pointing out the obvious irony.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Considering Tanzania has a pretty big Muslim population and most of the people killed were Tanzanians, they probably could have figured on killing some Muslims. And London, are you fucking kidding me?
And I'm saying there isn't any irony of you look at his beliefs.
2triky wrote:It's laughable if you think their primary target was the death of fellow Muslims.
Any collateral damage is unintended and excusable under the fundamentalist interpretation of Sharia Law.
Yokohammer wrote:The more I look into this (not that I'm spending a lot of time on it), the more complex, deep-rooted and freaky it looks.
Here's an interesting article that invokes Stieg Larsson, the guy who wrote the incredibly popular Millenium trilogy. Apparently he had been somewhat of a crusader against the far-right during his lifetime.
Anders Breivik, Stieg Larsson, and the Men with the Nazi Tattoos
I didn't realize that the neo-nazis and ultra-nationalists were so entrenched in that part of Europe.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:I've always found it interesting how many neo-Nazis there are in Russia. If anyone would be anti-Nazi, you'd think it would be a Russian.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:I've always found it interesting how many neo-Nazis there are in Russia. If anyone would be anti-Nazi, you'd think it would be a Russian.
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
Samurai_Jerk wrote:I don't think that. However, when guys in Iraq walk into a market and blow themselves up the primary target is other Muslims. The point is to cause unrest.
Catoneinutica wrote:Brief observations:
-Norway, like Vichy France (what the French call "Free France") was an Axis Power. A lot of folks seem not to know that. (And Sweden was quite pro-Axis, although it proclaimed a facile neutrality.)
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Anti-Semitism is as Russian as vodka.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:I don't think that. However, when guys in Iraq walk into a market and blow themselves up the primary target is other Muslims. The point is to cause unrest.
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Anti-Semitism is as Russian as vodka.
2triky wrote:For sure. The Bolshevik Revolution was no friend to the Jew.
2triky wrote:Decades later, after the establishment of Israel in 1948, Stalin in his paranoia began to think Jews in the Soviet Union would have sympathies that lay outside the state. It didn't end well for them.
Typhoon wrote:Odd. A number of the leaders of the Bolshevik Revolution, such as Trotsky, were Russian Jews.
Many Russian and E European Jews were attracted to Communism as it seemed to be a way out of their historical situation.
Jewish intellectuals, typically of the left, across Europe and the US were strongly supportive of the Bolshevik Revolution.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests