Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Coligny wrote:Aboot nationnal geographic documentary:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/rockbeyondbelief/2012/02/08/how-nat-geo-misrepresented-the-foxhole-atheist-doomsday-prepper-megan-hurwitt/
Mike Oxlong wrote:I've posted several times about low carb eating. Works great for me, and several friends, but generally gets a poor reception in conversation - whether here or in person.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:One reason that low card diets get a bum rap is they're often misrepresented as "eat all the bacon, bunless hot dogs and cheese you want and still lose weight". The Atkins induction phase is unnecessarily extreme but after that what Atkins is essentially advocating is avoiding processed foods and sugar. Nothing controversial about that.
However, the low carb camp is often guilty of ignoring that one of the main reasons those diets work is that they are low calorie diets. Protein fills you up more quickly and doesn't spike your blood sugar therefore keeping your appetite in check. If you got 90% of your calories from carbs but only ate 1700 calories a day, you'd lose weight. On the other hand if you did a strict low-carb diet but consumed 5000+ calories a day, you'd gain weight.
Mike Oxlong wrote:Actually, avoiding processed foods and sugar sounds more like the WAPF. Low carb diets are most definitely not low calorie. The carbs are replaced with the much maligned, but actually very healthy, animal fats and protein. Fat has 9 calories per gram as opposed to the 4 found in protein and carbs. There are some low carbers out there that are still afraid of natural fats (trans fats aka frankenfats - highly processed vegetable oils - are to be avoided like the plague), but that's just a holdover from all fat phobia of the '80s. It's is not a simple calories in/calories out calculation. It's the body's response to what you eat that affects change. In a nutshell, carbs spike insulin, which signals the body to store fat. Keeping carbs low eliminates insulin spikes, chronically high insulin, and allows the body to burn fat as fuel rather than being in constant storage mode.
nikoneko wrote:This is really interesting. What I have always heard is carbs need to be about 50% of your diet on the basic nutrition/sustenance end. How does that fit in? I am guessing you still eat some good carbs such as veggies and fruit? And of course not the massively over doing it bit like many people do these days..
The other thing I think interesting is I also look for carbs as high as possible when I exercise as it makes a big difference in tiredness, I'll scarf as much 100 g in a few hours on some days. Very curious as so many athletes are on paleo diets, I'll have to look up what they eat/drink during exercise.
And for me I am so far the opposite it's hard to comment on diets at all. I've got myself to the point where I move about so much normally and burn 4-6000+ calories a week through exercise, usually just walking/hiking (which is highly underrated imo), that my metabolism is so high I can't eat much at one time and just eat small amounts all day. The downside being I am almost always hungry.
Coligny wrote:Aboot nationnal geographic documentary:
Mike Oxlong wrote:Atkins is not unique in recommending to avoid processed food, which is a good thing - a lot of carbs and frankenfats in those. Where I part ways with him is adding back carbs once you hit your target. While whole grains are better than processed ones, they are still broken down into simple sugars when digested. You get the insulin spikes, and the weight starts to come back. While groups of people who have been eating more traditionally unprocessed diets their whole lives can often tolerate modest amounts of whole grains without attendant weight gain, those of us who borked their metabolisms on the Standard Western Diet generally cannot tolerate even whole grain well without fat accumulation. While a small amount of unproccessed carbs (vegetables) are fine, most find that adding back grains only takes them back to where they started. As 'Hammer mentioned, once you get into a pattern of low carb eating, it's easy and habitual - and extremism isn't necessary.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Here's an interesting discussion that includes an explanation of the science behind why added sugars are bad and fat isn't.
chokonen888 wrote:I'm starting to think building one of these on the roof is my best survival strategy...
tidbits wrote:Has anyone tried the Japanese space food? Looks like there are many varieties nowadays and it seems like gaijin astronauts love them too.
chokonen888 wrote:Linky linky?
Coligny wrote:Do these ration works for diabetic people ? (not meee) Or is there something special availabul ?
tidbits wrote:I can't find the TV programme I watched before, which was showing the foreign astrounaut saying themselves that they like the Japanese space food. I think it was "Saba-no-miso-ni".
Anyway here is Wakata-san introducing the Japanese space food. (First 3 minutes just him introducing the varieties after that he was having meals with his colleagues)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcTsqBcU8QQ&feature=relmfu
Here is Jaxa's space food home page (see left panel), http://jaxagoods.com/ in English (But I can't find that Saba-no-miso-ni' in the list here!)
I think you can also buy it online via Rakuten, or other individual shop's webpage. . OR just go to any of the science museum shop. I have seen it in Mirai-kan (Odaiba)/ The Science Museum (Takebashi), the National Museum in Ueno.. or even a small science museum in Chiba.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests